Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 321 - 340
of 37,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 5:24 am
” Similarly in A, B, and C v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 11:27 pm
ASIC was, however, successful in submitting that the uncertainty or unintelligibility of a term causes detriment to a consumer’s rights and obligations within the meaning of s 12BG(1)(c). [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:50 pm
Watkins v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:38 pm
That trial court ruled that the school’s relief from federal taxes under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code was tantamount to “receiving Federal financial assistance” for purposes of Title IX, according to the District Court in the Buttner-Hartsoe v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
In Easter v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
C. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
" The Appellate Division's decision then pointed out that "Hearsay is admissible in [administrative] disciplinary proceedings," citing Education Law §3020-a[3][c] and Matter of Smith v New York City Dept. of Educ., 109 AD3d 701, leave to appeal denied, 22 NY3d 856. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:55 am
On February 19, 2024, the High Court in London in R (Al-Haq) v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 5:11 am
From yesterday's argument in Fischer v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 12:00 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
Her aim was in part to engage Syria, as recommended by the Hamilton/Baker report, which does sound like the opposite of isolating Syria.) c) She was on a fact-finding mission. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
See Breona C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:50 pm
Part 2 includes a summary and analysis of Breona C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 3:49 pm
See Breona C. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
He noted that just last week, in Bissonnette v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court’s notorious decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]