Search for: "State v. Character" Results 321 - 340 of 7,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm by Christopher Mathews
The defense presented two witnesses: an O-6 who deployed with LTC Lakin previously, and a CW3 who had also served with the accused, both of whom testified to his professional qualities and character. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:01 am by R.J. MacReady
Grammer later violated the conditions of his probation by failing to pay his court costs within 120 days and failing to avoid associating with persons having criminal records and having disreputable or harmful character. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:23 am
iStock_000000826902Small.jpg In assault with a dangerous weapon prosecution, trial court correctly excluded defendant's evidence of prior threats made by his victims against others, despite defendant's self-defense claim, because the defendant failed to show he had personal knowledge of the remote, prior threat, so that it might show the defendant's state of mind in shooting at victim under FRE 405(b), in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:40 pm by Mark Bennett
Not that the law invests the defendant with a presumption of good character, Greer v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:55 am by Matthew DeVries
  Let me expand my statement beyond 140 characters and give you some more information about the 1918 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:55 am by Matthew DeVries
  Let me expand my statement beyond 140 characters and give you some more information about the 1918 decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 7:43 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The State applied to, or Courts of such State, shall decide whether the crime or offense is of a political character. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:57 am
In summary, the General Court held that where an EUTM does not have inherent distinctive character, the distinctive character acquired through use of that mark must be shown throughout the territory of the EU (i.e. in all of the Member States covered by the EUTM). [read post]
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]