Search for: "State v. Cheeks" Results 321 - 340 of 433
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
Comm’n, 72 Colo. 477, 211 P. 868, 869-70 (1922) (cancer caused by being hit on cheek with a lump of coal) Georgia National Dairy Prods. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm by Kevin
The majority reasoned that the state has a significant interest in positively identifying suspects and the intrusion required, "a gentle rub along the inside of the cheek," is minimal. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:32 am by Michael McCann
But I could see at least some NBA owners finding the letter to be bad form, and we know from NHL v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:34 am
The plaintiffs in the case of Betty Nestlehutt and Bruce Nestlehutt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:30 pm
In Washington state Heller Ehrman wrote an amicus brief on behalf of a group of historians in the same-sex marriage case, Andersen v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:48 pm by Kevin
That was once not uncommon in certain circles, to the point that some state legislatures did feel the need to take action. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:06 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A case discussing self-defense is a Fort Worth Court of Appeals opinion styled, Crawford v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
” Twenty years later, he expressed the identical thought when dissenting from the Court’s decision to uphold the taking of “DNA cheek swabs” from all arrestees in Maryland v. [read post]