Search for: "State v. City Betterment Corp." Results 321 - 340 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
City of Schenectady 84 AD3d 1455, (3d Dep't May 5, 2011), is an interesting case. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:06 am by Max Kennerly
Proximate cause is established where the defendant’s conduct was a “substantial factor” in bringing about the injury (Stewart v New York City Health & Hosps. [read post]
13 May 2011, 6:07 pm by Bexis
NGK Metals Corp., 609 F.3d 239 (3d Cir. 2010), the court refused to expand Pennsylvania law in another exposure-only case:A federal court under Erie is bound to follow state law as announced by the highest state court. . . . [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: no, won’t change exodus of young people to cities; slow decline of indigenous communities. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Amlicke (In re VWE Grp., Inc.), 359 B.R. 441, 446 (S.D.N.Y. 2007); Kenai Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 3:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sillman v Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 NY2d 395 (1957); Grullon v City of New York, 297 AD2d 261 (1st Dept 2002). [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
Justice Phang referenced the case of City Chase Stores v LVMH – the question was whether the concept of infringing acts had to be “trade mark use” in their code. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., 597 F. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Better Late Than Never In July, the Supreme Court ruled in Vanderhoff v. [read post]