Search for: "State v. City of Iowa City"
Results 321 - 340
of 510
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 5:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The problem, as the petitioner Tyson Foods sees it, arises from the fact that class plaintiffs used averages to show how much time Tyson didn't pay, in the aggregate, for class members' donning and doffing gear they needed to wear to work at Tyson's pork processing plant in Storm City, Iowa. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The problem, as the petitioner Tyson Foods sees it, arises from the fact that class plaintiffs used averages to show how much time Tyson didn't pay, in the aggregate, for class members' donning and doffing gear they needed to wear to work at Tyson's pork processing plant in Storm City, Iowa. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am
New York City, 438 U. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
The problem, as the petitioner Tyson Foods sees it, arises from the fact that class plaintiffs used averages to show how much time Tyson didn't pay, in the aggregate, for class members' donning and doffing gear they needed to wear to work at Tyson's pork processing plant in Storm City, Iowa. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
Iowa (10-134) and Lamtec Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
To my mind, New Hampshire v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:45 am
Kelley v. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 8:33 pm
Before Brown v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
" Ohio: City of Middleburg Heights v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am
For instance, Maryland permits local governments to provide a credit for expanding manufacturing facilities.[6] Similarly, Idaho allows counties to exempt TPP that is part of an investment of at least $500,000 in a new manufacturing plant for up to five years.[7] Seven states (Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania) exempt all TPP from taxation, while another five states (Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota, and… [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 2:45 am
Additionally, she would need to collect a local hotel and motel tax of 8 percent and remit it to the Cartersville city government.[1] She would also owe state and local sales tax on the transaction, remitted to the state. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 6:02 pm
Schill et al., The Condominium v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 4:15 pm
Lindh v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 4:51 am
The recent opinion in City of Greenville v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
Department of Health and Human Services1301 Young Street, Suite 1169Dallas, TX 75202Voice Phone (214)767-4056FAX (214)767-0432TDD (214)767-8940Region VII - Kansas City (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska)Frank Campbell, Regional ManagerOffice for Civil RightsU.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
The law of some states seems to reject this theory, see, e.g., Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:35 pm
We're very lucky that Mark Janis and Graeme Dinwoodie graciously convened a meeting of 16 trademark professors this weekend in Iowa City, Iowa. [read post]
