Search for: "State v. Cross"
Results 321 - 340
of 14,899
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
On August 5th, in Hamm v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
In many Maryland drinking and driving cases, the decision in Rowe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 10:13 am
Citing Adams v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:58 am
In his paper, Professor Rau discusses the effect the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in BG Group v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:50 pm
When filed, this case was seen as another chapter in the on-going battle between downwind and upwind states over cross-border pollution. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 10:11 am
[Cross-posted at electionlawblog.com]On this tenth anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
In American Atheists, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
What I said: The interesting twist here came during the defense attorney's cross examination of [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
” The Court notes that a federal lawsuit alleging tortious conduct by police testifying as prosecution witnesses in the state case provides the good faith basis for raising the issue.So when you are considering cross-examination of a police officer, don’t forget to check PACER and County Clerk records. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
There was no suggestion that AA had not co-operated with attempts by the SSHD, and the Red Cross, to trace his family in Afghanistan. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 6:31 am
United States Bureau of Land Management (D. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:59 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 52 Friends of the Headwaters MSJ 53-1 Tribes and Tribal Orgs MSJ 61-1 US Cross Motion 64 Enbridge Cross Motion 65 Tribal Reply 67 Friends Reply 69 US Reply 70 Enbridge Reply 90 DCT Order Prior post here. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 12:30 am
iStock_000000114540_1.jpg In child pornography prosecution, in the absence of any showing that the officers had a direct or personal financial interest in the result of the case, the trial court properly excluded cross-examinationthat the Sheriff's Office would receive about 25 percent of the proceeds resulting from the forfeiture of the defendant's home, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:21 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:44 pm
The Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the American Lung Association in the litigation involving EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (“CSAPR”). [read post]
29 May 2015, 9:16 am
Cross posted at Life Sentences Blog. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:09 am
Interesting case out of the Oregon Court of Appeals today (2/20/08), with a legislative history of ORS 31.735:MAN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Appellant Cross-Respondent, v. [read post]
