Search for: "State v. D. M." Results 321 - 340 of 9,777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2016, 12:32 pm
The state had previously filed a compliant brief that covered many of the same points, but we ordered replacement briefs in light of Daire v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 9:42 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 2:56 pm
  (To be clear:  I'm not saying she doesn't work there; the firm simply doesn't seem to have elected to put her on its list of attorneys, at least presently.)Regardless, it's a holding to remember:  You can be DQ'd entirely if it's likely that you'll be a material witness at trial, at least in a situation like this. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 11:41 am
As well as a lot of them generally; the Ninth Circuit published eight separate opinions today, and I'm not nearly finished reading all of them.I nonetheless thought I'd at least briefly mention this one. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:42 pm
All of a sudden, you’d have the State of Connecticut, the defense, and the victim advocate all acting in cross-purposes maybe. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
The state has to prove that stuff, and it undeniably didn't do so here.I'm sure that Justice Moore is right that the Legislature enacted Section 368 because it wanted to punish elder abuse crimes more severely. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:24 am by Meg Martin
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:44 pm
  The State Board of Equalization was rightly slammed in that decision for doing stuff it shouldn't have done (and not doing stuff it should have done). [read post]