Search for: "State v. E. C." Results 321 - 340 of 9,366
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Explaining the fight over Virginia’s Robert E. Lee statues
30 Jun 2020, 4:02 am by Scott Bomboy
Plaintiff William C. [read post]
Constitution Daily - https://constitutioncenter.org/blog
Emails, Stalking and Jurisdiction
27 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
Chase, supra (quoting § 18-9-111(4)(c)(II))) (emphasis added). [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Today at the Court
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Benjamin C. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Great Summary of Louisiana E-Discovery Developments
16 Nov 2010, 3:30 am by Scott Wolfe Jr
See White v. [read post]
Construction Law Monitor - http://www.constructionlawmonitor.com/
W.D.Tenn.: No level of suspicion required to initiate a knock-and-talk
3 Sep 2011, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
STERN V. MARSHALL SEMINAR MATERIALS PRESENTED 12/6/12 TO WORCESTER COUNTY BAR ASS'N BANKRUPTCY SECTION
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
Impudent Bankruptcy Lawyer - http://impudentbankruptcylawyer.blogspot.com/
Universal Periodic Review Report of the United States of America – Human Rights
20 Mar 2015, 1:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Federal Agencies Annex IV: First Cycle UPR Recommendations Supported in Whole or in Part by the United States Annex V: U.S. [read post]
beSpacific - http://www.bespacific.com/
CA8: Nighttime search warrant was justified
31 Aug 2011, 4:03 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
Chubb Custom Insurance Co. v. Space Systems/Loral Inc.
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am by WIMS
§ 9612(c), does not apply. [read post]
Environmental - Appeals Court - http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.com/
South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., Docket No. 17-494
22 Jul 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
Frederic Borel - http://fredericborel.blogspot.ch/
Updated List: Local Rules, Forms and Guidelines of United States District Courts Addressing E-Discovery Issues
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am by K&L Gates
R. 26 Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery District of Wyoming V. [read post]
Electronic Discovery Law - http://www.ediscoverylaw.com/
Franks v. Delaware
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
Wallace, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Special Agent.U.S. v. [read post]
CYB3RCRIM3 - http://cyb3rcrim3.blogspot.com/
Argument preview: Who’s afraid of the categorical approach?
10 Apr 2019, 8:50 am by Leah Litman
Next Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Opinion analysis: The Supreme Court narrows an exception to mandatory firearm sentences
17 Nov 2010, 9:10 am by Brooks Holland - Guest
On Monday, the Court in Abbott v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Criminal Law Appellate Court Opinion - 2/10/2014
10 Feb 2014, 5:01 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC35388 - State v. [read post]
CT Judicial Law Libraries' NewsLog - http://ersa.jud.ct.gov/lawlibnews/Lists/Posts/AllPosts.aspx
Broadly Defining a Director’s Duty in Bill C-97
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
More significantly, the Court in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders explicitly rejected the notion of shareholder primacy, stating, [read post]
Slaw - http://www.slaw.ca
Court opinions issued Aug. 6, 2019
7 Aug 2019, 10:43 am by Allan Blutstein
Ctr. v. [read post]
FOIA Advisor - http://www.foiaadvisor.com
E-Mails Not Privileged in this Legal Malpractice Case
29 Oct 2007, 3:35 am
CPLR 3101(c). [read post]
New York Attorney Malpractice Blog - http://blog.bluestonelawfirm.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on June 12, 2024 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial DepartmentMARK C. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/