Search for: "State v. Epstein"
Results 321 - 340
of 683
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
Recall that many states, including Illinois, view Florida law as so extreme to call it contrary to public policy. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:12 am
Adam Liptak had a story in yesterday's Times on the Didden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
In light of the Court’s decision in Black v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
Hobby Lobby and Zubik v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 3:00 am
(See Benishai v Epstein, 116 AD3d 726, 727 [2d Dept 2014].) [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 9:05 pm
[Ira Stoll, more] “Returning to Common-Law Principles of Insider Trading After United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
I met Michael years ago at an AEI conference that he and Richard Epstein organized on federal preemption of state law. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:28 pm
Gray, with David Fisher, Alabama v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:39 am
Related Documents Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 11:39 am
And the 2012 Alvarez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:06 am
In Go v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:56 am
Robert Epstein assisted in this matter as well. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am
Robert Loeb and Emma Kohse examined the first invocation of the state secrets privilege by the DOJ in the Trump administration in Salim v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 am
Thus, defendant’s theory that plaintiff breached a duty of care to it by choosing to apply for attorneys’ fees via a sanctions motion instead of a motion under § 285 amounts to no more than an allegation that plaintiff made an error in judgment, which does not state a cause of action for malpractice (see Rosner v Paley, 65 NY2d 736, 738 [1985]; Sitomer v Goldweber Epstein, LLP, 139 AD3d 642 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:46 am
., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 10:01 pm
We failed you.Iqbal v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm
Among other things, it explains why the mandate runs afoul of the five part test established in the Supreme Court’s most recent Necessary and Proper Clause decision, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 6:28 am
This post was written with assistance from Radhika Gupta, a 2019 Summer Associate at Epstein Becker Green [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
Seqway, Inc. v. [read post]
