Search for: "State v. First Judicial Dist."
Results 321 - 340
of 1,056
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
The dismissal order elevates state civil procedure rules over the First Amendment and form over substance. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm
“Cooperation between counsel and good-faith efforts by them to resolve disputes without judicial intervention are essential to the efficient and expeditious administration of justice in this State” Spiller v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
New York City Dist. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.)). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Id. at 8 (citing Tarrant Regional Water Dist. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 8:49 am
Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Stradford, 725 N.Y.S.2d 189 (Dist. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 2:17 pm
(Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:51 am
Scott V. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
Marin Municipal Water Dist. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
Dist. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:11 am
Fifth Judicial Dist. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:11 am
01-17-00138-CV (Tex.App. - Houston [1st Dist.] [read post]
2 May 2015, 10:00 pm
Under this doctrine, a federal district court “must refuse to hear a de facto appeal” of a state court judgment and “must also refuse to decide any issue … that is ‘inextricably intertwined’ with an issue resolved by the state court in its judicial decision. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
From Doe 1 v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm
The Court is requested to take judicial notice of the CONSENT ORDER pursuant to TEX. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
(Save Livermore Downtown v. [read post]