Search for: "State v. GC"
Results 321 - 340
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Patent No. 7,678,843 entitled DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIAL COMPOSITION and owned by GC Corporation. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:05 pm
In a recent court of appeals decision (Southeast Culvert, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
California) and Cisco’s GC speaks out (loudly) about H-P’s efforts to enforce its noncompetes. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Down-on-their-luck David & Son, with hungry counsel, v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
Tom states: If you think that a secret is something you tell one person at a time, you’re in the wrong job. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
"On July 1, 2011 Bishop Henderson -- despite having his term on the Title IV Review Committee shown as continuing until GC 2012 -- transferred directly from his former position on that Committee to the new Disciplinary Board for Bishops, having been appointed to the Board by the Presiding Bishop under the purported authority of the new (but unconstitutional) Title IV Canons which "took effect"* on that date. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
For instance, in N.L.R.B. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:55 am
Criminal law In R (on the application of Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice; MacDermott, Re, [2011] UKSC 18, [2011] 3 All ER 261 the court was split 5-4 on the controversial issue of exactly when compensation should be paid to victims of miscarriages of justice. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:43 am
As we have reported, in May 2011 the Supreme Court ruled in R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellants) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Respondent). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 4:49 pm
A personal status did not need to be immutable or innate (Clift v the United Kingdom no 7205/07 July 2010 and A, and Others v the United Kingdom [GC] no 3455/05 ECHR 2009). 5. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:08 am
(Part One) – http://tinyurl.com/3p8hbzp (eDiscovery Team) A Timely Warning to Employees About Social Media – http://tinyurl.com/3vjacww (Amanda Bronstad) Baglow v Smith – The Increasing Importance of Context in Defamation Claims - http://tinyurl.com/44pmecq (Bob Tarantino) Connecticut Courts Weigh In on Social Media as Evidence – http://tinyurl.com/3hgy34v (Marie Grady) D.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 10:51 am
By Eric Goldman Rothamel v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
I will now take the opportunity to offer a very brief comparison between the Dutch case and the treatment of the attribution issue by the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (GC). [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:30 am
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on the parameters of additional insured coverage called Suffolk Construction Corp. v. [read post]
