Search for: "State v. GP"
Results 321 - 340
of 1,811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2011, 11:57 am
GP Ltd v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 7:26 am
Commentary on the Court’s decision in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2012, 5:28 am
”The panel drew a distinction between its ruling and a ruling by the Supreme Court last January in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
The court then turns to United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:47 pm
Here is the abstract: In the Supreme Court's recent decision on GPS monitoring, United States v.... [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:28 pm
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:48 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 7:25 am
" United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:54 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:06 pm
The transcript from United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:38 pm
GP Gypsum Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 9:38 am
SCOTUS decided United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:52 am
The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held in State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:18 am
;United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:38 pm
Justice Breyer was particularly keen on this, and suggested at one point that maybe the Court could rule that this particular level of surveillance certainly crossed the line and required a warrant, and leave it to Congress and the legislatures of the states to draw the line about the particular circumstances in which warrants would be required in other instances.The traditional liberal/conservative split on the Court might break down on this issue, as it did in Kyllo v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:11 pm
The Virginia Court of Appeals en banc reaffirms the panel decision in Foltz v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:19 am
The US Supreme Court ruled unanimously that tracking a criminal suspect by GPS requires a warrant, and to do otherwise would be unconstitutional. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:03 pm
In the wake of the case (.pdf), United States v. [read post]
