Search for: "State v. Hale" Results 321 - 340 of 1,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm by Giles Peaker
The review letter stated that another offer of accommodation would be made. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am by ASAD KHAN
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:00 am by Isabel McArdle
JD (Congo)  and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Public Law Project [2012] EWCA Civ 327 The Court of Appeal has considered the test for the second stage of appeal in immigration cases, when someone wishes to appeal from the Upper Tribunal to the Court of Appeal. [read post]
  Williams v The London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 was about the opposite scenario; where a local authority wanted to accommodate but the parents wanted the children back. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
The award of attorney fees in favor of the Hales is therefore unwarranted. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 8:27 am by Eric Goldman
If the dissent is right, all fifty states may hale him into court to answer for it. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am by Nick Armstrong, Matrix
For these reasons the Court said that the Secretary of State would likely need to redraft her guidance, and in particular the provisions for exceptionally disapplying the rule. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
But at least since legal realist Robert Hale published his Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-Coercive State in 1923, the question of what constitutes state "intervention" in the market has been contestable. [read post]
24 May 2008, 3:01 am
On this day in ...... 1980, the International Court of Justice rendered its decision in United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran (United States of America v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am by The Charge
A similar due process analysis governed the case in United States v. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:42 am by Laura Sandwell
On Friday 4 November the matter of Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor will be heard in Courtroom 2 by Lady Hale and Lords Brown, Mance, Kerr and Wilson. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 2:17 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Even if Minnesota claimed that pollution emitters in North Dakota were harming the state, Minnesota couldn't hale the North Dakota emitters to court. [read post]