Search for: "State v. Heard"
Results 321 - 340
of 18,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division's decision in this appeal of a ruling by a New York State Supreme Court is set out below: Employees Retirement Sys. for the City of Providence v Rohner 2024 NY Slip Op 00674 Decided on February 08, 2024 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 8:44 am
appeared first on State and Federal Communications. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
Finally, she told me that while Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
If you decide to go down that path, with full knowledge of the issue preclusion consequences of your strategic choices, to me, you can hardly be heard to complain about that result. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:47 am
The legal opinion would become popularly known as The Boldt Decision.The actual title of the case is United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:52 am
From Weaver v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others,… [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:00 pm
No brake noises heard after repair. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:25 pm
Pearson v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 12:51 pm
That is the 1920 case called Eisner v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in four cases this week. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
The CRSCC’s argument is a variation on the now oft-heard claim that Section 3 is “not self-executing. [read post]