Search for: "State v. Honda" Results 321 - 340 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2011, 6:00 am by Sean Moloney
 The Supreme Court, in Geier v American Honda Motor Co., found the state claim preempted because the DOT had purposely given manufacturers a choice to install airbags or automatic seatbelts due to safety-related concerns about consumers’ acceptance of new restraint technology. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
Declining death rates accompany all new model SUVs as nearly every new SUV in the United States is sold with this technology. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co., 91 NY2d 169, 175 [1997], quoting Fitzpatrick v American Honda Motor Co., 78 NY2d 61, 67 [1991]). [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:20 am by David Lat
A black Honda CR-V was waiting at her left in a turn-only lane when the light turned green, she wrote.Both cars went straight and the CR-V pulled in behind her Volkswagen Passat, she said. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:33 am by Norman Gregory Fernandez
A short time later, a second collision occurred that involved the motorcyclist, a Honda CR-V and possibly a big-rig, Glace said. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
  The state trial court dismissed on the pleadings and California Court of Appeal upheld the dismissal, both relying on Geier v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:30 am by Nick Farr
American Honda Motor Co., 529 U.S. 861 (2000) (holding that Section 208 of the FMVSS preempted a state tort suit against a auto manufacturer for failure to install airbags). [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 10:34 am
Honda (holding that a state regulation mandating passenger side airbags was preempted by a federal regulation that did not require them). [read post]