Search for: "State v. Innes" Results 321 - 340 of 526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Just over a month ago (in a coda to "'Hungarians' and Hungarians attack the CTM"), the IPKat mentioned a Hungarian Patent Office decision, CITY INN v C CITY HOTEL, which preferred the approach taken by the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) in ONEL v OMEL to the conventional wisdom of most of the rest of Europe and concluded that a Community trade mark is not genuinely used if it is not used in more than one country within the European… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 6:02 am by Adam Chandler
Republicans—whether it’s Bush v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 3:25 pm
However, the CJEU's decision in Roche v Primus rejected this strategy. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
In the Second Circuit, which includes New York, the factors for the test for confusion is that as laid down in the Polaroid Corp v Polarad Elecs. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
Well, Bulgaria is in the EU and an EUTM can be blocked from registration by a national mark from any EU Member State. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:40 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Video below: Thousands take part in LGBTQ+ Pride march in Jerusalem Since Roe v. [read post]