Search for: "State v. Jews"
Results 321 - 340
of 939
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Massachusetts and Zucht v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 5:00 am
United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm
To confuse things further, some Reform Jews (i.e. non-Orthodox) outside of Israel also celebrate Shemini Atzeret on this second day. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm
Ireland Eugenie Houston , a barrister was “completely unjustified” in describing the treatment by her professional body of two complaints against her as like “a Jew in Nazi Germany”, a High Court judge has said. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
” Paul IV’s successor, Pope Pius IV, enforced the creation of other ghettos in most Italian towns, and his successor, Pope Pius V, recommended them to other bordering states. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 6:11 am
I have yet to see any British "anti-Zionist" leftist respond to an "As a Jew" by stating something along the line of, "I appreciate your anti-Israel sentiment, but as a good anti-racist I don't recognize Jewish ethnicity. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:22 am
In any case, following the success of Baker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:02 am
The judgement of the Court received enormous media coverage and was widely criticized for promoting discrimination against Jews. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
” Larson v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:06 pm
Harvey Weiner is National Judge Advocate of the Jewish War Veterans of the United States Inc., which submitted an amicus brief in support of the challengers in The American Legion v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 4:10 am
In Ferguson v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Although Schaeffer was vehemently anti-Catholic, he shared on important meta-view with some Catholics, which is the desirability of an "integral" connection between church and state, for the simple reason that it is only God's sovereignty that in fact legitimizes the State, and, therefore, it is the duty of the state to adhere to Divine Command. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 5:01 am
A federal court in New York concluded that they presented little more than conclusory assertions that they were qualified for promotion (in the face of evidence they did not meet the stated attendance requirements) and that the decision-makers had discriminatory animus, and the cited incidents of harassment were infrequent and could not be imputed to their employer (Hindi v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Near v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 10:53 am
For example, right in the beginning of the book, on page 4, Jacobson discusses the case of Rollins v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:57 am
In Rubinstein v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 9:33 am
Samama v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 10:28 am
(discussing misperception that CDA 230 causes platforms to tolerate such speech). [77] Snyder v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
Massachusetts, which held that states have the power to make vaccination compulsory in the public interest and the 1944 decision in Prince v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm
We talked about some of the many battles this interaction has birthed, from massive resistance against Brown v. [read post]
