Search for: "State v. Ku" Results 321 - 340 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2011, 9:21 am by David Lat
• Ascribes to the teachings of the Ku Klux Klan and is the “grand dragon” of the U-M KKK. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:26 pm by Julian Ku
State Department to renegotiate the formula for annual contributions. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber stated in Cumpana v Romania on 17 December 2004 at paragraph 91, in the context of a publication covered by Article 10, that Article 8 “may require the adoption of positive measures designed to secure effective respect for private life even in the sp [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
And in the political arena, the constitutional debates of the 1940s and '50s seem less relevant today than those of the Progressive era, when liberals first attacked the conservative Court as pro-business, and conservatives insisted that only the Court could defend liberty in the face of an out-of-control regulatory state. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:24 am by Roger Alford
Sixth, as Julian Ku has noted earlier, foreign investors will now be wary of consenting to jurisdiction in Oklahoma state courts. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 9:51 pm by Julian Ku
Let me narrate the brief factual background of this case: On April 28, 2010, the Philippine Supreme Court issued its decision in Isabelita Vinuya et al. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by jamison
Supreme Court case of Virginia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:58 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
The Second Circuit’s recent panel opinion in Kiobel v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm by Trey Childress
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second... [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
“I’ve now had a chance to read a little more closely the decision, majority and concurrence, in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:33 pm by Gordon Smith
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit just issued its opinion in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
Judge Dismisses Piracy Charges(Julian Ku, Opinio Juris) How to Define Piracy (Cont'd):  A Critique of U.S. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:11 pm by Julian Ku
by Julian Ku In the first U.S. court opinion on piracy since 1820, a U.S. judge in Norfolk, Virginia has dismissed piracy charges against Somali defendants in United States v. [read post]