Search for: "State v. Lende" Results 321 - 340 of 2,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2007, 7:57 am
As an industry, we cannot be lending support to that approach. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Sovereign Immunity) United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” The plaintiff agreed to lend the defendant the $500,000, and the defendant presented the plaintiff with a “Redemption Agreement” reflecting the loan, which increased the loan amount to $666,360. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 3:10 pm by Unknown
(Indian Child Welfare Act) In Re Internet Lending Cases (Tribal Sovereign Immunity)U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Despite rallies in the stock markets and talk of recovery, the recent Global Financial Stability Report by the IMF states that economies of the developed world will experience a deeper protracted recession due to further deterioration in residential and commercial real estate markets, tight lending conditions and rising defaults in corporate and consumer loans. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 12:57 pm
The Court also stated that public lending is “different in nature from a sale … since the lending right remains one of the prerogatives of the author notwithstanding the sale of the physical medium containing the work”. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:09 am by John Jascob
By its decision, the petitioners state, the Sixth Circuit has exacerbated an existing circuit split by refusing to recognize an implied private right of action under Section 36(a). [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 9:43 am by Chip Merlin
As explained in an industry presentation on FRISS: ‘Much like the way banks rely on credit scores to assess the risk in lending to an individual, insurance carriers . . . rely on the FRISS Score to assess the likelihood of fraudulent activity in claims. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Hastings Law Journal has a new article (technically a "Note") on predatory lending and the implications of the Second Circuit's holding on federal (non)preemption of state usury laws in Saliha Madden v Midland Funding LLC et al, written by a recent graduate. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:05 pm by Christopher J. Hubbert
In addition, the SEC took the position that the BIAs are notes under the four-part test articulated in Reves v. [read post]