Search for: "State v. Makee R."
Results 321 - 340
of 34,862
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 2:18 am
Readers may possibly recall the judgment in In R (Z & Anor) v Hackney London Borough Council & Anor [2020] UKSC 40, which we noted at the time, here. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am
SWP erred by not taking reasonable steps to make enquiries about whether the AFR Locate software had bias on racial or sex grounds. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:46 am
In CODE REVISION COMMISSION and State of Georgia v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 12:55 pm
In Mass v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
., a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of H&R Block, Inc. and part of a family company (collectively, H&R Block) making up the largest provider of individual income tax preparation services in the United States. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 2:14 am
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, R (Heathrow Hub Limited & Anor) v The Secretary of State for Transport & Anor, and R (Buckinghamshire County Council & Ors) v The Secretary of State for Transport, heard 15 – 16 October 2013. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
R. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 9:37 am
Wilco Trading LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:52 am
To state a claim for patent infringement (or any other civil claim), a plaintiff must make a short plain statement of the claim under Fed. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
State law claims survive ADA claim dismissalGiordano v City of New York, CA2, 274 F.3d 740The Giordano case illustrates the fact that sometimes it is possible to maintain a discrimination lawsuit under state law notwithstanding the fact that the federal courts have dismissed similar claims alleging violations of federal law.In such situations the state courts should make the determination based on state law and not consider the action taken by… [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 6:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:04 pm
While United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The Appellants appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the Administrative Court did not have jurisdiction to make the order that it had, or, if it had, that the jurisdiction should not have been exercised. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:02 am
See Ugas v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am
When people blindly follow a letter, whether it be D or R, and feel compelled to support every leg of that party's platform, it leaves very little room for reasoned discussion on issues. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 5:55 pm
In a landmark privacy decision, R. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:41 am
The distribution of that money in the Member State is jointly determined under a Partnership Agreement which must be proposed by the Member State and approved by the Commission. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:06 am
R. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:32 am
Colvin, February 22, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries:Hanson v. [read post]
