Search for: "State v. Makee R." Results 321 - 340 of 34,867
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2023, 5:50 am by Annie Shiel
” Yet the publicly available version of the PPM makes no reference to the United States’ international human rights obligations, including to protect the right to life. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
In considering this, the Judge referred to the principles outlined by the Divisional Court in R (oao Woolas) v The Parliamentary Election Court [2010] EWHC 3169 (Admin); [2012] QB 1. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 12:50 pm by Chris Sivel
The Senate should return to Trenton to make bail reform a top legislative priority to keep our streets and neighborhoods safe. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:19 am by Eric Fruits
Carr cited the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
Timeliness has improved somewhat as a result of the Supreme Court of Canada’s imposition in 2016 of hard timelines on criminal prosecutions in R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by Gianna Hill
In a recent report, Viral V. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:19 am by Jacob Wirz
In a presidential system, such as the U.S., such fixes are much more difficult, making judicial deference more justified. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:38 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct)  lcb11@psu.edu     Abstract: Humans create but do not regulate generative systems of data based programs (so-called “artificial” intelligence (“A.I.) and generative predictive analytics and its models. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Hannah Rosborough
CanLII’s formula for composing a citation is similar: If there is no neutral citation, but a CanLII citation is available, the complete citation without a pinpoint would be: R v Oakes, 1986 CanLII 46 (SCC). [read post]