Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller"
Results 321 - 340
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
It certainly does not hurt those opposing the CRAFT BEER ATTORNEY mark that the TTAB stated in this decision, albeit a non-precedential one, that “no amount of evidence can transform a generic phrase into a registrable trademark” citing Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:05 am
Miller. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Consider, for example, Riggs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:10 pm
Miller, 169 Ga. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:24 pm
On May 31, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:00 am
” At Summary Judgments, Eric Miller discusses the Court’s recent decision in Utah v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 4:55 pm
The intro:THE Supreme Court ruled correctly on Monday when it found that Georgia prosecutors in Foster v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:22 am
That decision applied to earlier cases the 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie looks back at last week’s decision in Heffernan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:23 am
To discuss the case, we have Mark Miller, who is Managing Attorney, Atlantic Center, Pacific Legal Foundation. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Cir. 1984); Quaker State Oil Reining Corp. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
This marked the first time that I really felt accepted by game developers and real part of our industry. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:20 am
Miller’s Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Sys. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
The trial court ordered the parties to arbitration, appointed Judge Mark Davidson to arbitrate, and stayed the proceedings pending the outcome of the arbitration. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court held that its decision in Miller v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:44 pm
” (Cairns v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Louisiana, holding that Miller v. [read post]