Search for: "State v. Mart"
Results 321 - 340
of 2,108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2016, 9:42 am
(c) United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
In the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 4:04 am
Citation: Matthews v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm
"USA v Perez-Melendez, March 17, 2010. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:50 am
As we previously reported back on May 4, 2012, a three-judge panel of the Sixth Circuit, relying heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 5:08 am
Stiles v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
Universal Health Card, one of the first appellate opinions in the country relying on the Supreme Court’s watershed class certification opinion of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
Moreover, the Dukes v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 11:24 am
Supreme Court's decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:52 am
Supreme Court overturned a decision certifying a class for monetary damages under the same federal rule in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:21 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:52 am
Last Term, in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Con motivo de la celebración del sexagésimo quinto aniversario de la Declaración Internacional de los Derechos Humanos, el Colegio de Abogados de Puerto Rico (CAPR), la Comisión para los Derechos de los Inmigrantes, la Comisión de Derechos Humanos y la Comisión contra el Discrimen por Razón de Preferencia Sexual le invitan a participar del foro: United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:27 am
District Court Applied Wrong Legal Criteria in Certifying Gender Discrimination Class Action Requiring Remand for Reconsideration based on Standards Enunciated in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 1:57 pm
In the case of Cote v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:28 am
Co. of Sw. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 11:37 am
Today, the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals ("ICA") issued an opinion in Hui Malama v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
And the Supreme Court ruled that a general verdict that can be supported by at least one theory is enough, even though it is impossible to tell which theory the jury actually relied on, in Griffin v United States, 502 US 46 (1991). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
In Doe v. [read post]