Search for: "State v. Maxwell" Results 321 - 340 of 480
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
" NFP criminal opinions today (6): Yvonne Lynn Maxwell v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:47 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Supplemental brief of respondents Amicus brief of the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Amicus brief of DRI – The Voice of the Defense Bar Amicus brief of CTIA – The Wireless Association Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am by John Elwood
Maxwell, 10-1548, the petition alleging the Ninth Circuit gave insufficient deference to the state court under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”); the Court not only relisted again, but it also called for the record, suggesting that this case is now a more serious candidate for the state’s requested relief of summary reversal. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am by John Elwood
Maxwell, 10-1548, the petition alleging the Ninth Circuit gave insufficient deference to the state court under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (“AEDPA”); the Court not only relisted again, but it also called for the record, suggesting that this case is now a more serious candidate for the state’s requested relief of summary reversal. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:57 am by Terry Hart
” Kast-ing A Wide Net: Statutory Damages Under The Copyright Act — Scott Alan Burroughs discusses a recent 9th Circuit decision in Erickson Productions v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 5:47 am by Florian Mueller
I'd be surprised if the FRAND trial really had to be held next year.The winning lawyers are Douglas Campbell QC, Joe Delaney and Maxwell Keay (instructed by Gowling WLG).Plaintiff-friendly SEP enforcement rules are settled case law not only in the UK after Unwired Planet but also in Germany, where Sisvel v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]