Search for: "State v. McKinney" Results 321 - 340 of 426
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am by SHG
Furthermore, prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent a mistake, error in procedure, or error in substantive law (see Matter of Oglesby v McKinney, 7 NY3d at 565; Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d at 1058), even when such errors may be "grievous" (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d at 579), or "egregious" (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 62). [read post]
This effective racial segregation led to the same types of separate and unequal schools held unconstitutional in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
  Therefore, the default provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law apply (see Overhoff v Scarp, Inc., 12 Misc 3d 350, 359; Matter of Spires v Lighthouse Solutions, LLC, 4 Misc 3d 428, 435; Rich, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 32A, 1[A], at 176). [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 5:22 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
S. 138, 142 (1983), which held that “a State cannot condition public employment on a basis that infringes the employee’s constitutionally protected interest in freedom of expression,” and Garcetti v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:32 am by centerforartlaw
The Statute passed in New York State in August 2022 is part of a legislative package to “honor and support Holocaust survivors in educational, cultural, and financial institutions,” and to put forth paths to improve education about the Nazi period.[10] The Claims Conference: Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, an organization that secures material compensation for Holocaust survivors around the world, produced a study in 2020 that examined the knowledge of… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Also, there is a fear that, without accountability for errors by those in the practice of medicine, opportunities for correction of unacceptable medical care may be lost.Expert WitnessesOne of the more recent state Supreme Court decisions, Freed v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 4:37 am
 CARY PRESS,;No 06-CV-6686 (JFB) (ARL);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
Washington, in which the justices will consider whether a plaintiff must pursue all available administrative remedies through the state to be eligible to bring a federal civil rights claim; and Department of State v. [read post]