Search for: "State v. Merricks"
Results 321 - 340
of 493
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 6:25 am
As for the lost interest, that theory was correctly rejected by our state's highest court as "pure speculation. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Devin Watkins discuss Buehler v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:11 pm
State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
by Joe Merrick Staff Attorney, Indiana Court of Appeals [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 3:36 am
The holding of Bostock v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:51 pm
Several patent-related cases, Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
“Nixon v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:33 pm
"The odds are not good in confirming the President's nominee, Merrick Garland", she continued. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:29 am
Wade, decided in 1973, was a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Circuit Judge Merrick Garland, as too “liberal,” while others on the left deride him as too conservative. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
President Barack Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, was denied consideration last year. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:16 am
This precise issue was addressed by the Supreme Court in Marbury v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:13 am
(Additionally, the EPA’s 2019 direct final rule implementing various changes to the agency’s FOIA regulations survived legal challenge in Ecological Rights Found. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
State-on-top habeas case Woods v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:45 am
CASES* In Gorman v. [read post]
