Search for: "State v. Morales " Results 321 - 340 of 7,376
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2023, 8:40 am by CMS
Following the case of Giles v Rhind (No 2) [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (“Giles v Rhind”), Mr Justice Jay found that s 32(2) LA 1980 should be interpreted more widely, so as to cover “legal wrongdoing of any kind, giving rise to a right of action”. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Holly
  Finally, while it is not a generally recognized legal right in the United States, many foreign countries also recognize a “droit moral” or moral right, While more prominent in some countries than others, moral rights relate to the personal and reputational, rather than purely economic, connection an artist has with their work. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 Ecuador][Petition denied][Grave risk of harm] Sarmiento v Morales. 2023 WL 3886075  (S.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
NY State created a postmortem right of publicity specifically for computer-generated likenesses; Louisiana did so too. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Josh Blackman
Before this century, "no society—even those that did not have a moral objection to same-sex conduct, like ancient Greece—had recognized same-sex marriage. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The closest Barrett came to taking a position on a controversial matter of public concern was a 2006 petition, which stated "It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. [read post]