Search for: "State v. Nichols" Results 321 - 340 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional commentary comes from John Nichols in The Nation and Ryan Lockman at Lock Law Blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
The panel rationalized that alien IDs were merely digital placeholders allowing agency officials to trace immigrants, the value of which outweighed the burden of substituting functionally equivalent, non-exempt placeholders.AB: Requiring an agency to create identifiers that did not previously exist strikes me as the creation of a “new” record, which is precisely what the estimable Judge Nichols held in Institute for Justice v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
(Julius Sackmna, et al., Nichols on Eminent Domain § 1.11 (3d ed. 2005). [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
The factual background in Starglade Properties v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:57 am by Nabiha Syed
” At the Consumer Law and Policy Blog, Leah Nicholls and Brian Wolfman analyze Monday’s decision in Elgin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
In line with the CJEU's decision in Nichols Trade Mark Application [2004] ETMR 48, and the UK Trade Marks Work Manual, the Registrar stated the principle that full names, as trade marks, are deemed inherently distinctive, provided they are not extremely common and the number of traders in the relevant trade is not large. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
ECtHR jurisprudence made clear that the state was not required to tolerate unlawful occupation Hoire v UK, Yordanova v Bulgari [read post]