Search for: "State v. P. G."
Results 321 - 340
of 2,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2021, 6:45 pm
This post includes that intiial address in the original Spanish with a crude English translation, along with brief reflections on the state of Caribbean Marxism (considered in more detail here) in Cuba and its potential future course. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:35 am
In Nichols v. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 1:01 am
” (Carlos G. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
We join the officers and directors of the State Bar in expressing our deepest sympathy. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
The United States, meanwhile, firmly backed its ally, the Philippines. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:45 pm
Finally, the ECtHR recalls that the dominant position that State institutions occupy, requires them to exercise restraint in the use of criminal proceedings such as in cases to protect the reputation of the Prime Minister as a representative of the State. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 6:54 am
Reading their essays gives one a good picture of the state of issues that are boiling just beneath the surface within Cuba. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 1:19 pm
Beale v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
Siendo recomendable la lectura del citado auto, que resulta metódico, persuasivo y extenso (¡73 páginas!) [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
” Wickham v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:07 am
The Enlarged Board must examine the above admissibility requirements with respect to each referred question individually (see, for example, G 3/08 and G 2/19). [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
THOMAS G. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
P. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:11 am
” ’ ” United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for… [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
L. 106–95, §2(c), Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1316] (b) subject to section 1182(j)(2) of this title, who is coming temporarily to the United States to perform services (other than services described in subclause (a) during the period in which such subclause applies and other than services described in subclause (ii)(a) or in subparagraph (O) or (P)) in a specialty occupation described in section 1184(i)(1) of this title or as a fashion model, who meets the requirements for… [read post]
