Search for: "State v. Paul" Results 321 - 340 of 9,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
On 17 April 2023, the Washington State House concurred to the State Senate’s amendments to Washington State House Bill 1155, the My Health My Data Act. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 2:55 am by Etelka Bogardi (HK) and Stephanie Chan
See Nico Constantijn Antonius Samara v Stive Jean-Paul Dan [2021] HKCFI 1078[41]; Yan Yu Ying v Leung Wing Hei [2021] HKCFI 3160 and Huobi Asia Limited & Anor v Chen Boliang & Anor [2020] HKCFI 2750. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 11:00 am by The Clinton Law Firm
She was unable to state a claim because she could not establish that the lawyer’s legal work was the cause of the termination. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
  As for purely domestic communications, they were transmitted almost entirely through wires inside the United States (and therefore covered by FISA). [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 2:40 am by INFORRM
Many thanks to Michael Gordon and Paul Scott for their useful comments on a previous draft. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Court finds that this fails to state a cause of action, or worse, that Plaintiff actually did not have a good cause of action. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, the plaintiffs failed to state a cause of action alleging legal malpractice arising from Joseph D. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
  I’ve had a similar thought, that Mark has written the book Paul Freund couldn’t, but then I mistrusted it. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
8 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Just Security
Expert Q&A from Stockton Center’s Russia-Ukraine Conference by Jenny Maddocks The United States’ Proposal on Prosecuting Russians for the Crime of Aggression Against Ukraine is a Step in the Right Direction by Michael Scharf, Paul R. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am by bndmorris
Hoeflich and Stephen Sheppard, Lucy and the Judge:  Wood v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Paul (1992) ("a State may not prohibit only that commercial advertising that depicts men in a demeaning fashion"). [read post]