Search for: "State v. Revelle" Results 321 - 340 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Other areas of law think that law should pick extreme solutions, forcing information out of people who are “normal”—depends on the costs and benefits of revelation. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
All of the contributors see political history as defined less by elite subjects than by tensions between state and economy, state and society, and state and subject—tensions that reveal continuities as much as disjunctures. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am by Margaret Taylor
They lay out concerns about current members of the White House staff in addition to Kushner, including questions about whether Trump’s second national security adviser, John Bolton, revealed on his security clearance application his work with Maria Butina (who pleaded guilty in December 2018 to conspiring with senior Russian official Alexander Torshin to infiltrate the conservative movement in the United States as an agent of the Russian government). [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Clearly, big attention-grabbing cases such as Lloyd Rayney v The State of Western Australia (damages of $1.8m, including damages for economic loss, with another $773,866 in interest), Rebel Wilson v Women’s Day, Women’s Weekly, New Weekly and OK! [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
It was the year of great social transformation spurred by revelations--of sexual improprieties, and of policing and race in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 5:48 am by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
” “Do you seek an opportunity to withdraw your plea in light of [new] revelations” referred to in your brief? [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 2:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In upholding the production order, the Court emphasized the state’s interest in investigating and prosecuting terrorism, and noted that there would not be any confidential sources reveled, no off the record comments would be disclosed, there was no other alternative sources for the information. [read post]