Search for: "State v. Rosa" Results 321 - 340 of 516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  This occurs despite Civil Code 1941.1 which clearly provides that the presence of vermin can render a unit untenable and decisions like Green v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:35 am by Lawrence Taylor
 This was later confirmed by the Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by Christa Culver
Title: City of Santa Rosa, California v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 1:54 pm
De La Rosa, 4706, 3687N/05, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 9451; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Julia Solomon-Strauss, Stephen Szrom
The next session of the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri is currently scheduled to begin Feb. 12. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am by David Dirr
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital,[1] Douglas v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:06 am by Don Cruse
SUSAN COMBS, COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND GREG ABBOTT, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm by Neoshia Roemer
George has been solely or principally responsible for such landmark Indian law decisions as, Santa Rosa Band of Indians v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 1:31 pm by Editor
Munch, Wolfgang, Wrongdoing of International Civil Servants -- Referral of Cases to National Authorities for Criminal Prosecution Schmitt, Michael N., International Law and Military Operations in Space Segura-Serrano, Antonio, Internet Regulation and the Role of International Law Leininger, Julia, Democracy and UN Peace-Keeping -- Conflict Resolution through State-Building and Democracy Promotion in Haiti Human Rights Law Review (United Kingdom), Volume 6, Number 3, 2006 David Kinley… [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 12:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
And while Jefferson continued to insist, even when retired, that the federal and state governments represented two independent and equal sovereigns, Marshall, in McCulloch v. [read post]