Search for: "State v. Sams" Results 321 - 340 of 1,460
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
The last phrase of this rule was the part that gave Justice Sam Alito pause in his concurring opinion in Taylor v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
With respect to data security, there are few more useful and concise statements than the “Charney Theorem,” which states: “there’s always a percentage of the population up to no good. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This is just the way the “state unit” system works, whatever the Supreme Court had suggested in Gray v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:43 am by SHG
., Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Sam Alito, seized upon the opportunity to present his views on the conflict between religious liberty, a right expressly protected under the First Amendment, and the “right to same-sex marriage,” which he describes as “read into the Fourteenth Amendment” in Obergefell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am by Nedim Malovic
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm by CAFE
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:37 am by becassidy
EngagedScholarship includes C|M|LAW faculty publications; articles from the Cleveland State Law Review, the Journal of Law & Health, and the Global Business Law Review; historic law school publications; and special collections such as The Sam Sheppard Cases and Terry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Gluck, Tia Sewell
Vera Miranova provided her interviews with foreign Islamic State women about accountability and punishments for Islamic State activities. [read post]
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]