Search for: "State v. Shell" Results 321 - 340 of 1,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am by Jan von Hein
The decision is likely to have consequences not only for the appeal against the Court of Appeal’s denial of access to the English courts in Okpabi v Royal Dutch Shell, but also for the development of a more general duty of care of parent companies towards employees and people living in the vicinity of mines or industrial plants run by subsidiaries. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 11:59 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline)  U.S. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:11 am by Unknown
Rosette (Sovereign Immunity)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlMatter of Delaney (Attorney Discipline) U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 5:27 am by André Vos and Andrew Keightley-Smith
Homix was in fact just a shell company used to funnel money away from ailing and captured South African state owned enterprises. [read post]
While this is encouraging for employers, the current state of the law challenges common sense and makes an employer’s evaluation more—not less—complex. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
In its well-known decision of Illinois v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:42 pm by Deborah Heller
Part of the explanation for the repeal notes that the 2015 Rule exceeded the authority granted to the agencies by Congress by adopting an interpretation of the “significant nexus” test provided by Justice Kennedy in his concurrence in Rapanos v. [read post]
31 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Emily I. Bridges
Similarly, by analogy to Mac’s Shell Service, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am by MBettman
Shell Oil Co., 2009-Ohio-3 (2009) (taking other states’ interpretations of the UCC into account to promote uniformity) Read the oral argument preview of the case here and an analysis of the argument here. [read post]