Search for: "State v. Sherry" Results 321 - 340 of 588
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2015, 8:29 am by John Jascob
The second challenge to the Ninth Circuit opinion takes issue with its application of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States) prohibits such blanket interception. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The standard the City urged for reviewing a facial challenge used language from United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Megen Miller
In Richards v Richards, __ Mich App __; __ NW2d __ (2015) (Docket No. 319753), the Court of Appeals affirmed in part and reversed in part a Judgment of Divorce, ruling in favor of Sherri Richards, a client of the Speaker Law Firm, on all appealed issues. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 5:54 am by John Jascob
The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim and entered judgment for the defendants immediately, without allowing leave to amend.Standard of review. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:38 am by Patricia Salkin
Telian v Town of Delhi, 2015 WL 2249975 (NDNY 5/13/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Equal Protection [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Jha, eds, Three Essays Collective, 2014).Sherry F. [read post]
18 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Supreme Court recently heard argument in Glossip v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Last Wednesday, fellow Kat David performed an astonishing feat in posting a full and detailed account of the UK Supreme Court's hot-off-the-press ruling in Starbucks v British Sky Broadcasting almost before the ink was dry on this seminal case and probably well before their Lordships had replaced the cork in the bottle of their pre-prandial sherry. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by John Jascob
By Anne Sherry, J.D.In an allegedly fraudulent stock sale, the plaintiff’s provision of consideration in the form of its own NASDAQ-listed securities was enough of a domestic nexus to overcome the Morrison hurdle, at least in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]