Search for: "State v. Singh" Results 321 - 340 of 847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2012, 7:47 am by Kali Borkoski
Thanks to Tejinder Singh for the additional analysis in today’s Details. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The courts have traditionally been wary of allowing litigation to become an ancillary arena for the determination of the factual foundation for controversial topics (see the decision in British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rosalind English
It was not very long ago that courts were enjoined to base their determination on whether a certain position or tenet was a matter of spiritual belief (so as to attract the protection of Article 9) by the degree of sincerity with which it was held: see, for example, R(on the application of Sarika Watkins-Singh) v Aberdare Girls High School Governers (Defendant) and Rhondda Cynon Taf Unitory Authority and our comment on it. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 6:05 am
Electing the head of a state has turned into a political game; Brown v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:18 am by Jared Dummitt, Eliot Kim
This news follows a statement earlier last week  from Minister of State for External Affairs General Vijay Kumar Singh expressing support for freedom of navigation in the South China Sea. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:36 am by Shubhangi Agarwalla
Labh Singh had already held that customs are subject to a fundamental rights challenge. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Justice Singh dismissed plaintiffs’ rescission claim in Romanoff III. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:12 am by The Legal Blog
Parameswaran Pillai (2000(1) SCC 712) and Baldev Singh & Ors. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by The Legal Blog
Land Acquisition Collector & Anr., AIR 2005 SC 3165; and State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Parisian’s Testimony About Corporate Intent/Motive/State Of Mind/Ethics:  Lemons v. [read post]