Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 321 - 340
of 853
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
As such, "[t]here may be an infringement of the exclusive distribution right, under Article 4(1) of [the InfoSoc Directive], where a trader, who does not hold the copyright, sells protected works or copies thereof and addresses an advertisement, through its website, by direct mail or in the press, to consumers located in the territory of the Member State in which those works are protected in order to invite them to purchase it. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
Jaroslawicz v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 8:29 am
The second challenge to the Ninth Circuit opinion takes issue with its application of Basic Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 6:36 am
Health Ctr. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
” id, citing State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
Today, the Solicitor General filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 am
Jason McCourty Titans Jersey Jurrell Casey Jersey As with public school students, veterans enrolled at private universities have access to funds from various GI Bill programs, depending on the length of service, dates served and other factors5 and 12, choose a snowboard that features a 26 cm waist width For users who wish a big and clear screen and good overall quality, this is the way to go I’ve struggled with wanting to leave you for months but my big heart didn’t want to hurt YOU or… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Case C 379/14 TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd; Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV might have been one such case in the eyes of its parties and participants, though this Kat isn't so sure. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:24 am
There was evidence that ‘sofa workshop’ was used as a descriptive term by traders in the sofa business and that another 41 furniture-related businesses in the UK used the word “workshop” in their business names. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Fictional memory, imaginary state of mind, imagined shopping experience—and then we complain that we don’t have ecologically valid evidence! [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
Would that be reviewable by a court, given that it involves a question of the validity to state law? [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 7:37 am
Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:34 am
A very cursory search on Google brought up the case of FHR v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:48 am
He reasoned that the direct purpose of the margin scheme is to grant relief to traders who have acquired goods from a supplier who had no right to deduct input tax in respect of their own acquisition of them. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
In the course of his judgment, Mustill J stated the principles for the removal of arbitrator for misconduct. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:18 am
[See Bright v. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:31 am
Finally, Senz could not demonstrate that the United States was a small trader regarding the umbrella sector in the EU, so to reduce its importance when taking account of relevant prior art.US patent 5505221Senz had better luck with its second plea, since the General Court agreed that, notwithstanding the prior art, the two contested designs did after all have individual character of the two contested design. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
Is the maintenance of a register of transactions and rights in trade marks for the benefit of (i) the consuming public at large, (ii) prospective assignees, licensees and lenders who want to know who else may have an interest in those rights, (iii) the national tax authorities, (iv) other traders who want certainty as to the nature of their competitors' rights or (v) infringers? [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
In the Anheuser-Busch case, the importation from the USA of bottled beer under the BUDWEISER mark for use and sale in US military and diplomatic establishments within the UK did not entitle the plaintiff to establish what Lord Oliver later stated was the first element of a passing off claim. [read post]
