Search for: "State v. Warren."
Results 321 - 340
of 2,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 10:31 am
Senator Steven V. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am
In Warren Hospital v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Bowers v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Lucas, Matthew V. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 10:35 am
And more broadly, the reasoning in CAIR v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:41 am
Hear Thurgood Marshall, Earl Warren and others for the first time in Brown v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 8:00 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am
Warren). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm
First, the Supreme Court’s categorical unwillingness to consider state-law reversals is nothing more than a self-imposed constraint from its 1874 decision in Murdock v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
" Supreme Court Justice Earl Warren, 1954 Brown v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:05 pm
The case is State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 1:30 pm
— Most people don’t realize that Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:35 am
See Warren v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
And how would we, the humble voters feel if we found out that we're not voting for Donald Trump or Biden/Sanders/Warren/Bloomberg but for some local character who's free to do what he/she thinks is best? [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:52 am
Sure issued his decision in Regan v. [read post]
