Search for: "State v. Wells" Results 321 - 340 of 74,685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
Beyond the law in the organic-material sense and formal regulations, there is, as is well known, a multitude of norma-tive instruments that should not be neglected. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently applied the narrow and relatively new anticommandeering doctrine for the first time to federal Indian Affairs legislation in Halaand v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 3:35 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court recently applied the narrow and relatively new anticommandeering doctrine for the first time to federal Indian Affairs legislation in Halaand v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
 The Mail has also agreed to pay substantial libel damages, which Mr Vince has indicated that he intends to donate to charity, as well as legal costs. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On April 22, 2024, the Tennessee Governor signed into law House Bill 2100 (“TN HB 2100”), a fair access law that will, effective July 1, 2024, apply to, among others, national banks and state banks with more than $100 billion in assets, as well as insurers. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Timing Rule 262A.3 RoP states that “The Application shall be made at the same time as lodging a document containing the information or evidence and shall provide a copy of the unredacted relevant document and, if applicable, a copy of the redacted document. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]