Search for: "Stephens v. State Bar" Results 321 - 340 of 1,501
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
In the sparsely populated bar section, Jordan Lorence of Alliance Defending Freedom takes a seat, likely hoping for a decision in National Institute of Family Life Advocates v. [read post]
Having made such a serious finding of misconduct, the school was obliged (pursuant to statutory provisions) to make a reference to the Secretary of State for him to consider whether the claimant should be barred from working with children in the future. [read post]
8 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
It is affiliated with the State owned Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
On SCOTUSblog, Ronald Collins interviews Lee Levine and Stephen Wermiel about their just published book, The Progeny: Justice William Brennan’s Fight to Save New York Times v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am by Ronald Mann
  Three years ago, after California courts refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that barred class arbitration (on the ground that the provisions were unconscionable), a closely divided court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 3:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Neither of the above exceptions was present in the case at bar. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Frishberg.Traub Lieberman Straus & Shewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, NY (Stephen D. [read post]
6 May 2025, 1:44 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Frishberg.Traub Lieberman Straus & Shewsberry LLP, Hawthorne, NY (Stephen D. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:37 am by Andrew Trask
Gomez, a case closely watched by both sides of the class action bar, the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:00 am by Evan Lee
During Tuesday’s telephonic oral argument in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  The persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment sought to bar from present and future office all persons who betrayed their constitutional oath. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:05 pm by Daniel Harawa
Justice Stephen Breyer pressed Jaicomo about the policy implications of his position, stating that under Jaicomo’s reading of the FTCA, a plaintiff could collect damages from both the United States and the employee. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:46 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Other courts in other States seen to equate no-hire clauses with more restrictive covenants.The case is CMGRP, Inc. v. [read post]