Search for: "Stephens v. The United States of America" Results 321 - 340 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2015, 8:40 am by Victoria Kwan
., also took an overseas trip: on July 9, he delivered a lecture entitled “Roles of the Chief Justice of the United States” at the University of Tokyo. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
For example, produce has, since at least 1991, been the source of substantial numbers of outbreak-related E. coli O157:H7 infections.[19] Other unusual vehicles for causing E. coli O157:H7 infections have included apple juice, yogurt, dried salami, and mayonnaise.[20] According to a recent study, an “estimated 73,480 illnesses due to E. coli O157:H7 infections occur each year in the United States, leading to an estimated 2,168 hospitalizations and sixty-one deaths annually. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 4:56 am by Quinta Jurecic
Michael Knapp brought us news of the Second Circuit’s grant of an en banc rehearing in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed the decision in 1977, by a 2-1 margin, with each judge writing separate opinions. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419, three-time relist and quondam rescheduled case, asks whether “the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s legitimate, untainted assets (those not traceable to a criminal offense) needed to retain counsel of choice violates the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas follows Ginsburg with the opinion in Bank of America N.A. v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> State of Veracruz v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which it is considering the mens rea requirement for federal narcotics cases. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:44 am by Ronald Mann
” The final point ended up consuming a good bit of Hallward-Driemeier’s time: what to make of the decision of the major institutional actors that appeared in the case – the United States and the Bank of America – to file on the debtor’s side, supporting the right to appeal. [read post]