Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 321 - 340
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2020, 7:26 am
(Amber Phillips, The Washington Post) The Amy Coney Barrett Hail-Mary Touchdown (Emma Green, The Atlantic) Amy Coney Barrett is set to transform America’s Supreme Court (Steven Mazie, The Economist) Amy Coney Barrett joins the Supreme Court in unprecedented times (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Barrett Will Take Oaths at White House and Supreme Court, Following Kavanaugh and Gorsuch Path (Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal) Should Justice Barrett Recuse from 2020 Election Litigation? [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 3:22 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie recaps Wednesday’s oral arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:36 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at the case, along with a cert petition filed last week that involves a state-court subpoena for the president’s financial records, observing that “[e]ach case presents the Supreme Court with a separation-of-powers quandary—how to adjudicate a dispute between branches of the federal government in Trump v Mazars; and between the president and state prosecutors in Trump v Vance. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America Blog, Steven Mazie discusses various challenges to state restrictions on abortion and observes that, with its order on Monday letting stand a lower-court ruling that blocked North Carolina’s ultrasound from going into effect, “the Supreme Court has effectively foreclosed ultrasound laws requiring doctor explanations in Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 4:23 am
Lyle Denniston covered the release for this blog; commentary and analysis come from Marty Lederman at Balkinization, Molly Duane at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Leland Beck at Federal Regulations Advisor, and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
Molly Runkle compiled early coverage and commentary in an evening round-up for this blog; other coverage comes from Daniel Fisher of Forbes and Steven Mazie of The Economist. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:11 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie writes that a “book-length opinion striking down Ohio’s congressional map by a panel of three federal judges on May 3rd was written with one particular readership in mind—the justices of the Supreme Court,” who are expected to decide in two cases this term “whether the constitution imposes limits on partisan line-drawing. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 3:40 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “today a legal tussle over whether the House Judiciary Committee may see portions of the [Mueller] report that were redacted before its release in April 2019 comes to a head”: “[O]n May 8th the Supreme Court temporarily blocked the disclosure, allowing the Department of Justice a chance to request that the court take another look. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 8:32 am
Other Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court Weighs Monetary Damages Under Religious Freedom Law (Jess Bravin, The Wall Street Journal) Supreme Court Hears Case of Muslims on No-Fly List (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) Supreme Court opens politically charged term with major business cases involving Google, Oracle and Ford (Tucker Higgins, CNBC) Term opens with Texas-N.M. water war; Barrett hearings loom (Pamela King, E&E News) SCOTUS Questions Whether… [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:27 am
” Steven Mazie comments in The Economist on the significant consequences even one Supreme Court appointment will have for the Court’s constitutional jurisprudence over the next few years; although “the justices seem stuck in standby mode” and the “docket for their upcoming term is looking wan,” he asserts, disputes “over presidential power, administrative leeway, freedom of speech, abortion, race, religion and discrimination against gays… [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:51 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie argues that, “[w] hatever impact Mr Scalia’s death has on the presidential race, it will undoubtedly have a profound effect on the current Supreme Court term. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
” In his column for The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie analyzes Monday’s oral argument in Department of Transportation v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 4:02 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Epic Systems v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:20 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[i]t should not come as a shock that Justice Alito, who hears emergency requests from the federal circuit encompassing Pennsylvania, turned down Republicans’ demand to get involved in a state-law question over which the nation’s highest court has no jurisdiction. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 4:30 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie observes that the “paper-and-ink volley” in the parties’ briefs was not “fought in polite, lawyerly terms. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:56 am
” And at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that, if the Court does (as many expect) take up one or more of the challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage, “it might be natural to assume that we’re gearing up for another 4-4 right-left split, with Justice Anthony Kennedy in the middle. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:25 am
Writing for The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that “[t]his week’s drama over the Utah ruling gives an early indication that, in the justices’ eyes, the time is not quite right to sweep away all state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie looks at the legal challenges to the appointment of Matthew Whitaker as deputy attorney general, including one that “comes in the guise of Michaels v Sessions, a case challenging the federal ban on guns for convicted felons that has seen its caption change to Michaels v Whitaker” during the cert petition stage. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:27 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie suggests that the president’s decision to abandon the effort to include a question about citizenship on the 2020 census “signaled both a willingness to let the Supreme Court’s decision stand and several reversals of positions the government had insisted upon—repeatedly and with a straight face, in print and in person—during the course of the litigation. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 3:53 am
” In The Economist, Steven Mazie remarks on “two significant signs that as Donald Trump’s first Supreme Court nominee gets to work, he may envision his job in more muscular terms than did Mr Scalia. [read post]
