Search for: "Stewart v. State of California"
Results 321 - 340
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2008, 11:55 am
(9) Asked by Justice Kennard what would have happened in 1948 if the state had set up domestic partnerships for interracial couples, San Francisco attorney Stewart said: ??? [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
What meaning this old ruling, Perez v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 4:13 pm
Like Stewart, kinda wonky. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
Arguably, it punishes the status of being a felon; see, Robinson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 12:09 am
In affirming the 2nd District Court of Appeal's decision in Marathon Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 48314 Olympia, WA 98504-8314 Phone: (360) 586-3558; (800) 634-4473 (V/TTY/Toll Free) Web: www.wa.gov/ddc Helping Hands for the Disabled P.O. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 3:14 pm
California (1973), but modified for minors. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
The case accepted by the justices comes from California, where a law passed in 2000 prohibits employers from using money they receive from the state to oppose or support unionization efforts. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
California, 543 U.S. 499 (2005).........60In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436 (1890) ............... 2, 32 viiLaGrand v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 12:54 am
An Ohio appellate court found that a similar statute in that state allowed only people -- not organizations or other entities -- to receive money from such accounts. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 12:59 am
In its decision in Chrismon, et al. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 11:15 am
California, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 9:00 am
See California v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
App. 1993); Stewart v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 1:41 pm
In Minnick v. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 7:06 pm
(That would be the 1948 California Supreme Court case that wiped out the state's ban on marriages between certain races.) [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court, in Kelo v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:10 am
LEXIS 36615 (SD NY, May 18, 2007), a New York federal district court allowed an inmate in a work release program to move ahead with his Free Exercise and state law challenges to the refusal by authorities to grant him a pass to attend Pentecostal church services.In Stewart v. [read post]
