Search for: "Strickland v. State"
Results 321 - 340
of 869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d) and Strickland v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The test for incompetence of counsel is found in the Supreme Court case, Strickland v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
It all ties together.The standards created by Strickland and §2254(d) are both "highly deferential," id., at 689; Lindh v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:51 pm
Autumn Fox and Doug Thompson won today in State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
” Premo v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 11:09 pm
The Court instead stated that the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty (AEPDA) amendments in federal habeas law and Strickland v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
That remarkable behavior is constitutional pursuant to the Supreme Court’s 1984 decision in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In Strickland v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
In Hawkins v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:53 pm
Bypassing the deficient performance prong of the Strickland v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 4:33 am
Strickland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 10:29 pm
As for who has the better legal argument, I would point out that the State cited State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 7:31 am
Strickland, 375 S.C. 76, 650 S.E.2d 465 (2007); not Degenhart v. [read post]
8 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Strickland (07-689) and Ysura v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:11 am
Strickland v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:43 pm
Chappell12-5890Issue: (1) In Strickland v. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 6:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
That dismissal was based on an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 5:59 am
United States v. [read post]
