Search for: "Strickland v. State" Results 321 - 340 of 917
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2014, 2:59 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Padilla held that the defendant's claim was subject to the two-prong ineffective assistance of counsel test in Strickland v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:40 am by Larisa Vaysman
Strickland, 560 F.3d 443, 446 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting Bellotti v. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:16 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
The district court found that the State court’s view of the facts, and its application of the two-part ineffective assistance test set forth in Strickland v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 8:14 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The state courts failed to correctly apply the "prejudice" prong of Strickland v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm
The New York State courts have departed from the second prong of Strictland, adopting a rule somewhat more favorable to defendants as in People v Turner. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 11:56 am by Albert Wan
One year later, the United States Supreme Court decided Padilla v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by John Elwood
”  Coming to us from the Land of the State-on-Top Habeas Petition is Hoffner v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 11:09 pm by Cynthia Alkon
  The Court instead stated that the 1996 Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty (AEPDA) amendments in federal habeas law and Strickland v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 12:42 pm by Rory Little
  And AEDPA and Strickland, writes the Court, “do not permit federal judges to so casually second-guess the decisions of their state-court colleagues. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:40 am by Rory Little
  As he put it to close the day, “record silence under AEDPA and Strickland means the State wins. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 7:12 am by Rory Little
When the Supreme Court, two Terms ago, extended Strickland’s “ineffective assistance of counsel” doctrine to plea negotiations (Lafler v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
  The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]