Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 321 - 340
of 7,085
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2011, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:33 pm
Hansen (Religious Freedom; Free Exercise Clause) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlScudero v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 4:32 am
Under United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
For instance, the dangers that the Equal Protection Clause were intended to address reared their ugly head in the Old South after the disastrous 1876 decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 11:27 am
Parke Davis, Inc., 746 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1984) (“The United States was unaware that Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 9:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am
There is consequently a strong political incentive for countries to remain characterized as developing in the context of climate commitments. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:56 pm
Today's Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
These claims must be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:51 am
These claims must be brought in the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:53 am
An excerpt: On Tuesday in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:24 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
In M/S Bremen v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 9:02 pm
Instead, they appealed and the United States Court of Appeals reversed the district court. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Viruet v City of New York , 97 NY2d 171, the Appellate Division explained that as the Taylor Law is incorporated into the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act and the exemptions in the Act are substantially consistent with Article 14 of the Civil Service, "the override provision of Unconsolidated Laws §7405(5) does not apply" in this instance.Noting that the exclusions for managerial and confidential employees are an exception to the Taylor… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Viruet v City of New York , 97 NY2d 171, the Appellate Division explained that as the Taylor Law is incorporated into the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act and the exemptions in the Act are substantially consistent with Article 14 of the Civil Service, "the override provision of Unconsolidated Laws §7405(5) does not apply" in this instance.Noting that the exclusions for managerial and confidential employees are an exception to the Taylor… [read post]
