Search for: "Superior Court of the State of California"
Results 321 - 340
of 6,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2023, 1:46 pm
The insurance dispute went to a bench trial before California (San Mateo County) Superior Court Judge Marie S. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 11:56 am
On December 30, 2022 a California County Superior Court judge sided with the restaurant group, and issued a temporary restraining order blocking the implementation of AB 257. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 11:24 pm
Both cases went badly for the taxpayers, and for many of the same reasons: failure to plan, failure to keep residency related records, establishing or retaining superior living accommodations in California, spending more time in the state than in their home jurisdiction during the year at issue. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:13 pm
He was convicted in a California state court on several charges, including two for discouraging a witness from reporting a crime. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
Anchorage Superior Court Judge Jack McKenna ruled in December that Eastman was eligible to hold public office despite his membership in the Oath Keepers, a far-right militia group that had some members and leadership participate in the riot at the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm
Lac de Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
The initial complaint in this case was filed on December 20, 2013 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court rulings. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 2:22 pm
The initial complaint in this case was filed on December 20, 2013 in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:45 pm
Based on the preliminary hearing record, the superior court granted the motion and dismissed the charges. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:12 pm
On January 1, 2023, fellow San Francisco Superior Court Pro Tem Discovery Judge, Douglas Robbins, published “The California Discovery Manual 2023“, which is full of helpful “Practice Notes. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Last Friday, Bloomberg Law had: California Can Change Name of UC Hastings Law School, For NowA California trial judge tentatively allowed the state to change the name of UC Hastings College of the Law under legislation created in response to founder Serranus C. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:58 pm
Winter is coming and many legal departments will be left in the cold. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 12:05 am
Judge Okays UC Law School Name Change: A San Francisco Superior Court judge ruled on Friday that the state can tentatively change the name of the UC Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
TwitterDecision Date: May 6, 2022 The United States District Court for the Northern District of California was asked to decide on the question of the violation of the right to free speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution in the backdrop of the “state-action doctrine” elaborated and backed by various precedents. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
Fashion houses Fendi and Marc Jacobs have been sued for trademark infringement in the United States District Court for the Central District of California by another clothing company known as Roma Costumes, Inc. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:44 am
Now Earthjustice, representing East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice, has filed a version of that petition in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:16 am
Yesterday it was reported by Reuters and subsequently by other media that the Tribunal de Commerce de Paris (Paris Commercial Court) imposed a fine of approximately 1 million euros (to be precise: €1,090,909) on Apple over some of its App Store terms.Most of the reporting focused on the fact that some terms--such as Apple's absolute right to reject apps submitted by developers--were deemed unfair ("déséquilibre", i.e., an "imbalance" in trading… [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
In an opinion filed on November 14, and later certified for publication on December 13, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 3) affirmed a Sonoma County Superior Court judgment upholding the EIR for a 180-unit apartment complex proposed on a 15.45-acre parcel of vacant land along the Petaluma River. [read post]
