Search for: "Superior Court v. Civil Service Commission" Results 321 - 340 of 380
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am by Susan Brenner
(As I noted in an earlier post, parties can take the 5th Amendment privilege in the context of civil litigation as long as their testimony would implicate them in the commission of a crime.) [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
The Commission on Dietary Supplement Labels (the Commission), a seven-member body that was established under DSHEA to "provide recommendations for...the regulation of label claims and statements for dietary supplements, including the use of literature in connection with the sale of dietary supplements and procedures for the evaluation of such claims," held public meetings around the United States from 1996 through 1997. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 4:13 am
Superior court's intervention also may be anticipated. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 1:08 am
Los Angeles Superior Court Survives Its First Furlough The National Law Journal Los Angeles County Superior Court survived the first of 12 days of self-imposed job furloughs Wednesday. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 4:04 am
As to his claim that he did not have proper notice or time to prepare for the hearing, the court commented that his attorney could have appeared on his behalf and raised these issues before the administrative tribunal.Dismissing his appeal, the Appellate Division noted that the Department was not required to state a reason for denying Salas reinstatement to his former police officer position.* §50.4(e) of the Civil Service Law, in pertinent part, provides that… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
We also hold that the writ is available to correct errors of law and that the superior court erred in denying the writ. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
No matter how civil the discourse, the thought of Mr. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:51 am
A report by the receiver in Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
The Court had asked for briefing on whether Jackson should be overturned in the context of Montejo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
If a person ultimately found to have superior rights to retention was laid off and another individual having lesser rights to retention was continued in service instead, courts will usually award the individual who was laid off in error back salary and other benefits and the appointing authority would be directed to reinstate the individual retroactively to his or her former position as well.Layoffs from positions in the unclassified service: Layoffs of… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
Cohoes; peace officers Last Act: 03/13/09 REFERRED TO CODESS3284 ADAMS -- Relates to binding arbitration in negotiations with members who are designated as security services or security supervisors Same as A 6336 BLURB : Civ Serv. coll nego; security serLast Act: 03/13/09 REFERRED TO CIVIL SERVICE & PENSIONSLast Action Date: 03/16/09(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners)   Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor)… [read post]