Search for: "TECHNICAL CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC."
Results 321 - 340
of 811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 8:13 am
Google, Inc., 2010 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 6:51 am
Tickets.com, Inc., 54 U.S.P.Q.2d 1344, 1346 (C.D.Cal., 2000).[7] See DeJohn v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 6:22 pm
Doctor's Data, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
The reason is simple: technology companies know that consumers want a product that works well, not simply one that looks good. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 1:17 pm
The value of every unit of energy used by the manufacturing sector is multiplied by as many as 20 times from the production of thousands of high value products though the value chain. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Aventis, Inc., 2015 WL 4879112 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:24 pm
Facebook, Inc. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
Inc. 48 USPQ2d 1477, 1479 (TTAB 1998). [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 12:20 pm
Inc. 48 USPQ2d 1477, 1479 (TTAB 1998). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
Ultra Bond, Inc. products[.] [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
If the process is confusing, it does not matter is the text is technically accurate! [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:50 pm
According to the agency, the new rule incorporates technical changes into the existing regulation that do not substantively alter the regulatory framework. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 1:14 am
The test was phrased well by Justice Brandeis in Kellogg v National Biscuit: "...the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer". [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Carrera is the best class action case of the year in the FDA-related products field, although it technically involves a dietary supplement rather than a prescription medical product. [read post]
24 May 2018, 7:35 am
Viacom Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:54 am
Well, the court found a difference between consumers' everyday understanding of the word “credible” and its unique and technical meaning within the FDA guidelines. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 12:58 pm
Galperti counterclaimed that Boltex and Weldbend falsely advertised their products as American-made and misrepresent their quality, characteristics, and technical standards. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
Central was not the successor to All-Glass; All-Glass continued in the same business after the transfer as before, including the production and sale of products under the ZILLA mark. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:30 am
DyAnsys, Inc., 2015 WL 2398931(N.D. [read post]
27 May 2010, 3:40 pm
Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc., 783 S.W.2d 442 (Mo. [read post]
