Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges"
Results 321 - 340
of 490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 9:07 pm
NOTE TO READERS: The following post was written before the federal government, on Friday evening, filed a brief in the Supreme Court urging the Justices not to get involved in this controversy at this point, and to let the dispute work its way first through the federal appeals court in Washington. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:06 pm
A federal judge’s ruling in May striking down Oregon’s ban cleared its last court hurdle when the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:04 pm
Through all of this year, from January on, the Court could not help but be aware of what was happening in the lower courts, with a string of decisions nullifying state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 6:51 am
Judge Owen was on the Texas Supreme Court when Heritage v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 4:05 am
Essay reported that Potter had degenerative spondylosis in her cervical spine that was being aggravated by her work as a dental hygienist, but he said it was "impossible" for him to be able to say how much of the aggravation was caused by her work with any of her prior employers.Based on Essay's report, Potter filed a petition in the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court seeking benefits for her neck injury.The Workers' Compensation Court Judge… [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
The ruling (found here) is the third by a state judge in Florida; the issue is now moving through appeals, so the Fort Lauderdale judge put the new ruling on hold. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
Judge Frederick Scullin’s opinion carefully walks through the Supreme Court’s precedents of District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 6:26 am
There often has been reasonable, irreconcilable disagreement over the meaning of the Constitution, and the Supreme Court had never before allowed Congress to impose a purchase mandate under the Commerce Clause or an exaction labeled a penalty under the Taxing Clause. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 7:36 am
In the meantime, though, as the cases work their way through the courts, the subsidies will stay in place. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Initially, the district court in Oklahoma denied Hobby Lobby’s request for an injunction, and the district court in Pennsylvania denied Conestoga’s request. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:21 am
Idaho’s governor has told a federal judge that, if she strikes down the state’s six-year-old ban on same-sex marriage, state officials may ask the Supreme Court to take on the issue immediately, without waiting for an appeal through the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, upheld the University of Michigan’s consideration of race in its law school admissions policy (Grutter v Bollinger, 84 EPD ¶41,415). [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 10:43 am
But it does underscore a continuing theme running through the extended Aereo/FilmOn X litigation: in reaching its conclusion that Aereo is not likely to succeed on the merits, the three-judge Tenth Circuit panel split 2-1. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 6:36 am
The drug court program was instituted in Oklahoma in 1995. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:11 am
In the past two months, two federal courts, one in Utah, the other in Oklahoma, have declared that state bans on same-sex marriage violate the Constitution’s promise of equal protection and due process. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Because of this disarray, it’s a good idea for the Supreme Court to take the case. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court has, over time, concluded that corporations enjoy some constitutional rights, but not others. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
Meanwhile, in the courts, the Supreme Court has taken yet another case about patentable subject matter, this time squarely implicating the patentability of software (Alice v. [read post]
